46 percent of Pakistanis approve of Osama bin Laden

Kizzume

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/09/1...stanis/index.html

Quote:

"We have conducted 23 polls all over the Muslim world, and this is the most disturbing one we have conducted," said Ken Ballen, the group's head. "Pakistan is the one Muslim nation that has nuclear weapons, and the people who want to use them against us -- like the Taliban and al Qaeda -- are more popular there than our allies like Musharraf."

The poll was conducted for Terror Free Tomorrow by D3 Systems of Vienna, Virginia., and the Pakistan Institute for Public Opinion. Interviews were conducted August 18-29, face-to-face with 1,044 Pakistanis across 105 urban and rural sampling points in all four provinces across the nation. Households were randomly selected.

According to poll results, bin Laden has a 46 percent approval rating. Musharraf's support is 38 percent.

Does this bother anyone? It bothers me a lot. Are we going to continue worrying about Iran?
_________________

Google · AdSense

Tumbleweed · Black Ops Joined: 02 Jul 2007 Posts: 3687 votes: 3

I don't think we can stop worrying about either one myself. Pakistan is the hotspot but Iran poses a big threat in the region also. One has nukes, the other won't stop until they get them.

CHUQ · Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 4:29 am Post subject:

This new consideration may not be the most wise direction for the US ot take right now.

Vice President Dick Cheney, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and a number of President Bush’s top national security advisers met Friday at the White House to discuss the proposal, which is part of a broad reassessment of American strategy after the assassination 10 days ago of the Pakistani opposition leader Benazir Bhutto. There was also talk of how to handle the period from now to the Feb. 18 elections, and the aftermath of those elections.

Several of the participants in the meeting argued that the threat to the government of President Pervez Musharraf was now so grave that both Mr. Musharraf and Pakistan’s new military leadership were likely to give the United States more latitude, officials said. But no decisions were made, said the officials, who declined to speak for attribution because of the highly delicate nature of the discussions.

LINK
_________________
Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it.

please visit my blog: http://studiesandobservations.blogspot.com/

Tumbleweed · Black Ops Joined: 02 Jul 2007 Posts: 3687 votes: 3

Bush and his special forces plan might not be a good option. Laughing

Pakistan says won't let foreign troops on its soil

By Zeeshan Haider

ISLAMABAD (Reuters) - Pakistan will not allow any country to conduct military operations on its territory, officials said on Monday, rejecting a report that said the United States was considering authorizing its forces to act in Pakistan.

The New York Times said on Sunday the U.S. government was considering expanding the authority of the CIA and the military to conduct far more aggressive covert operations in Pakistan.

The U.S. officials considering the move were concerned over intelligence reports that al Qaeda and the Taliban were more intent on destabilizing Pakistan, the newspaper said.

Pakistani government and military officials dismissed the report and said Pakistan would not permit any such action.

"Pakistan's position in the war on terror has been very clear -- that any action on Pakistani soil will be taken only by Pakistani forces and Pakistani security agencies," said Foreign Ministry spokesman Mohammad Sadiq.

"No other country will be allowed to carry out operations in Pakistan. This has been conveyed at the highest level," he said.

http://www.reuters.com/article/worldN...N0265048020080107

Kizzume · Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:51 pm Post subject:

It looks like we're in for some serious turbulence between the U.S. and Pakistan. Pakistan has made it very clear--they support terrorism. That's probably where Osama has been hiding for a while.
_________________