HomeForumToday's PostsAlbumArcadeVideosShowcaseAboutContactPrivacy
My Controls
Home
Forum Index
Today's Posts
Search
FAQ
Username:

Password:

 Remember me



I forgot my password

Don't have an account yet?
You can register for FREE

Newest Games
This is a member only game, you need to register to playMap Test
This is a member only game, you need to register to playThreedsuper
This is a member only game, you need to register to playSuper mario2
This is a member only game, you need to register to playBirdy
This is a member only game, you need to register to playSloyd3
Reference
The U.S. Constitution

Supreme Court Decisions

The Congressional Record

The Federal Register
[China buries quake dead as new aftershock hits] [Bush in Saudi Arabia to press king on oil and Iran] [Amid clamor to drop out, Clinton campaigns on] [Bin Laden marks Israel anniversary with combat vow] [Zimbabwe sets run-off date, Tsvangirai to return] [U.S. sees need for "tangible action" on Iran: Israel] [Suspected suicide blast kills 10 in Sri Lanka] [Indian police suspect Bangladeshi hand in blasts] [Marine sentenced for sex abuse of Japan teen] [Indian village proud after double "honor killing"]
Bush must release global warming reports

 
Advanced Search      
Post new topic   Reply to topic    American Politics Forum Index » Domestic Policy » Environment
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Tumbleweed

Black Ops
Black Ops


Offline

Joined: 02 Jul 2007
Posts: 3687

Reputation: 118.9
votes: 3
PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:30 am    Post subject: Bush must release global warming reports Reply with quote
The court has sided with the environmentalist.

By TERENCE CHEA, Associated Press Writer

 
Quote:
SAN FRANCISCO - A federal judge ordered the Bush administration to issue two scientific reports on global warming, siding with environmentalists who sued the White House for failing to produce the documents.

U.S. District Court Judge Saundra Armstrong ruled Tuesday that the Bush administration had violated a 1990 law when it failed to meet deadlines for an updated U.S. climate change research plan and impact assessment.

Armstrong set a March 1 deadline for the administration to issue the research plan, which is meant to guide federal research on climate change. Federal law calls for an updated plan every three years, she said. The last one was issued in 2003.

The judge set a May 31 deadline to produce a national assessment containing the most recent scientific data on global warming and its projected effects on the country's environment, economy and public health. The government is required to complete a national assessment every four years, the judge ruled.

The last one was issued by the Clinton administration in 2000.

The administration had claimed that it had discretion over how and when it produced the reports — an argument the judge rejected Tuesday.

"The defendants are wrong," Armstrong wrote in the 38-page ruling. "Congress has conferred no discretion upon the defendants as to when they will issue revised Research Plans and National Assessments."

The plaintiffs — the Center for Biological Diversity, Friends of the Earth and Greenpeace — said the ruling was a rebuke to an administration that has systematically denied and suppressed information on global warming.

"It's a huge victory holding the administration accountable for its attempts to suppress science," said Kassie Siegel, an attorney for the Center for Biological Diversity, one of the plaintiffs that filed suit in Oakland federal court in November.


Source
_________________
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.
Thomas Paine

It's impossible to be an effective leader of a country when everyone thinks you are stupid.
Author Message
Google

AdSense





PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:30 am    Post subject:


Author Message
CHUQ

Agitator
NSA


Offline

Joined: 03 Jul 2007
Posts: 4393
Location: Just North of a hurricane
Reputation: 133
votes: 3
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
I say wait for the reports to come out. Business and the govt have a wealth of scientist on payroll and there could be a whole plethora of reports supporting the opposition. Who will know for sure?
_________________
Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it.


please visit my blog: http://studiesandobservations.blogspot.com/
Post new topic   Reply to topic    American Politics Forum Index » Domestic Policy » Environment


Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours

Display posts from previous:

  

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group | Mobtown Blues by Scott Stubblefield & Mobtown Tees | bbAntiSpam | phpBB SEO