 |
| Mutli-Forum Chat |
• Popup Chat •
This shoutbox is shared among several forums. Remember that some of the users chatting are members of other forums. Please be courteous and treat everyone in the shoutbox with the extra care you would for any guest in your home. 
Multi-Forum Chat sponsored by:
|
| Top Games |
 | Tetris3 Played: 137 |  | Wheel of fortune Played: 98 |  | Monkey Dive Played: 75 |  | Map Test Played: 44 |  | Catbowling Played: 38 |  | Pyramid solitaire Played: 22 |  | Super mario2 Played: 20 |  | Shooting gallery Played: 18 |  | Kab00m Played: 18 |  | Paraglyder Played: 18 | |
|
|  |
| Author |
Message |
Rupchuk
Moderator
 
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
 votes: 4
|
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 10:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh my this is the first post I've put up in forever (forever being since October 16th). There are a lot of new faces, still some old ones though. Anyways, to the topic at hand.
It all depends on what you want in a candidate. Personally I'm voting for Ron Paul, a US rep from Texas. I don't care what kind of "chances" he has at getting elected. He's the only candidate I know of that has the constitution and America as the highest priority. He's the only Republican candidate who wants a pullout of Iraq, not just of Iraq either but of other countries (like Korea, Germany, Italy, the UK, Japan, etc.). He's the only candidate who even talks about social security as if it is a big issue. He is opposed to the war on drugs, his voting record and own words confirm this. He is very pro-2nd amendment. He is rated with a B from the NRA, if that matters. He has constantly called the ATF for what they are and has said he would disband them if elected. He also wants to do away with huge amounts of the federal government, all of which are unconstitutional and wasteful.
If you want someone who cares about America more than special interest groups then I'd vote for Dr. Paul. Some of his ideas are hard to swallow, especially if you like big brother holding your hand. Honestly though, no other candidate can hold a candle to him. |
|
 |
|
| Author |
Message |
TomSlayer
Civilian
|
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
What America needs right now is progress on numerous domestic fronts. Issues like Social Security, medical costs, immigration control, a balanced budget and national debt.
Considering how the political climate in Washington is so divisive, between parties, progress will require a president who is able to reach across party lines to get anything accomplished. Both Democrat nominees are as bias as they come.
If you listen to the way Hillary has ever talked about the other party it's clear she sees Republican shadows in her dreams. We have zero chance of her doing what is required to work together.
Obama doesn't have a long history to draw from but based on the record he has as a Senator, he is the most one sided voter in the Senate. Talk is cheap and his work in the Senate doesn't show an effort to find common ground. Washington may be receptive for a short time but it won't take long and his one sided agenda will meet resistance like status-quo.
McCain on the other hand has a long history of reaching out to find common ground in order to accomplish progress. He's paid a price in his own party for this effort. The nice term used to describe him is a Maverick but with how bias Republican leadership is, he is considered a trader by some.
Bottom line, we need progress on the issues I mentioned in the beginning of my post. All candidates have platforms with plans for change. IMO, Washington will continue to be divisive and McCain has the most likely chance to make that progress happen. After all, he has been doing it for years already.
My other major point is our financial situation in this country. When I look at all candidates platforms I see one one which stands out as responsible.
Both Hillary and Obama's plans will require a costly amount. If you think the war is expensive, their plans will make the war seem cheap!!!
McCain's plans aren't close to the same amount of cost (including the war). Again, he has a history of responsible spending. In all his time in Washington, he has never taken earmarked federal funds back to his home state. He didn't vote for funding the last round of helping us with our taxes...why? Because it didn't include cuts.
As far as the war goes, if we don't stay in Iraq until the new govt. is stable enough to maintain control, it's just a matter of time before we end up going back. Reguardless of your position on the war, history backs this up. |
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 1
|
|
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
|
|
Display posts from previous:
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum You can password protect topics in this forum
You can topic ban in this forum You can prevent guests in topics in this forum You can attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
|  |