Site Announcements

Upgrade Complete! Thank you for your patience. New styles and new features will be arriving soon! :mrgreen:
New Chat!

Edwards agrees to smaller three-way debate

A forum to disuss the candidates and issues of the upcoming 2008 Presidential election.

Edwards agrees to smaller three-way debate

Postby Tumbleweed on Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:16 pm

It looks like MSNBC is going to host a 3-way debate .

MSNBC
Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards renewed his call Tuesday for smaller, more substantive candidate forums, agreeing to MSNBC’s invitation to debate Sen. Hillary Clinton and Rep. Dennis Kucinich on live television.

Edwards, a former senator from North Carolina and the Democrats’ vice presidential candidate in 2004, and Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., were captured on open microphones criticizing Kucinich, D-Ohio, by name after an NAACP candidates forum last week.

Edwards was recorded by several news organizations telling Clinton that “we should try to have a more serious … smaller group,” to which Clinton replied, “We’ve got to cut the number.”

“Our guys should talk,” Clinton added, handing ammunition to critics who accused her and Edwards of colluding to freeze out lesser-known Democrats like Kucinich and former Sen. Mike Gravel of Alaska.


Source
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.
Thomas Paine

It's impossible to be an effective leader of a country when everyone thinks you are stupid.
User avatar
Tumbleweed
Boss
Boss
 
Posts: 3625
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 10:07 pm

Postby CHUQ on Wed Jul 18, 2007 4:32 am

Of course they would like this, it would eliminate the voice of the other candidates and give the appearance that there is only 2 or 3 candidates. The frontrunners have canned opinions, the other tiers have passion and conviction. I say screw 'em let all speak!
Stupidity Is The Deliberate Cultivation Of Ignorance


please visit my blog: http://lobotero.wordpress.com/
User avatar
CHUQ
Boss
Boss
 
Posts: 4360
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:04 am
Location: Just North of a hurricane

Postby Wolf on Wed Jul 18, 2007 7:27 pm

I was watching Edwards on Hard Ball last night, and I have to admit I jumped to conclusions. My mistake. I think Edwards, Kucinich and Gravel ought to be in a debate, with Richardson, Obama and Clinton in another the following evening. The remaining candidates could then have a debate the evening after that. Yeah, three nights of debate might be a bit much, but it could be spread out over a week, and then the next round the candidate rosters could be mixed around so different candidates get to debate each other. I know, sounds complicated, but debates these days are little more than soundbite fodder when there are nine people on stage competing for time.
User avatar
Wolf
Soldier
Soldier
 
Posts: 228
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2007 10:46 pm
Location: Ohio

Postby Tumbleweed on Wed Jul 18, 2007 7:45 pm

It looks like Richardson in moving up in a few polls lately, especially in New Hampshire.

Gravel has to be the worst candidate running. :lol:
To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.
Thomas Paine

It's impossible to be an effective leader of a country when everyone thinks you are stupid.
User avatar
Tumbleweed
Boss
Boss
 
Posts: 3625
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 10:07 pm

Postby CHUQ on Thu Jul 19, 2007 4:49 am

Gravel is his own person, haha. He is a bit strange, but did you know that he entered the entire Pentagon Papers into the senate record back in the 70's?
Stupidity Is The Deliberate Cultivation Of Ignorance


please visit my blog: http://lobotero.wordpress.com/
User avatar
CHUQ
Boss
Boss
 
Posts: 4360
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 4:04 am
Location: Just North of a hurricane


Return to 2008 Election News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest