American Politics Forum Index
HomeForumToday's PostsAlbumArcadeMedia CenterAboutContactPrivacyTOSRegisterLog in
My Controls
Home
Forum Index
Today's Posts
Search
FAQ
Username:

Password:

 Remember me



I forgot my password

Don't have an account yet?
You can register for FREE

Mutli-Forum Chat
Popup Chat
This shoutbox is shared among several forums. Remember that some of the users chatting are members of other forums. Please be courteous and treat everyone in the shoutbox with the extra care you would for any guest in your home.

Multi-Forum Chat sponsored by:
Recent Topics
» What's For Supper?
by killerbee on Fri Jul 04, 2008 5:29 pm

» Politics Suck
by Coyote on Fri Jul 04, 2008 4:28 pm

» Congratulations killerbee
by Coyote on Thu Jul 03, 2008 11:45 pm

» Are day laborers the problem ?
by Rupchuk on Thu Jul 03, 2008 10:56 pm

» Against Obama (But not for the reasons that you may think)
by Rupchuk on Thu Jul 03, 2008 6:35 pm

Top Games
Tetris3
Played: 137
Wheel of fortune
Played: 98
Monkey Dive
Played: 75
Map Test
Played: 44
Catbowling
Played: 38
Pyramid solitaire
Played: 22
Super mario2
Played: 20
Shooting gallery
Played: 18
Kab00m
Played: 18
Paraglyder
Played: 18
Reference
The U.S. Constitution

Supreme Court Decisions

The Congressional Record

The Federal Register
[Colombia shows rescue video] [Former Senator Jesse Helms dies at 86] [Firefighters hold line on two California wildfires] [Obama mixes politics, holiday barbecue] [U.S. champion retains hot dog eating title] [Mugabe says opposition must drop claim to power] [Iran responds to big powers' nuclear offer] [Poland rejects U.S. missile shield offer] [G8 to tackle inflation, but concrete action elusive] [Belarus blast at concert wounds 50]
Rice Pleads With Bureaucratics
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    American Politics Forum Index » Middle East
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
CHUQ

Agitator
Boss




Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts



Reputation: 133
votes: 3
PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 3:01 am    Post subject: Rice Pleads With Bureaucratics Reply with quote
No body wants to go to Iraq. poor babies! Did anyone give the troops the option?


WASHINGTON (AFP) - US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on Thursday made a worldwide appeal for her diplomats to serve in Iraq following uproar over new rules forcing them to work in the war-torn nation or risk dismissal.

"The secretary is going to send out a cable worldwide to people talking about this decision as well as encouraging people to serve in Iraq," State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said.

Rice's cable came after an emotional meeting in Washington late Wednesday between senior State Department officials and hundreds of diplomats on the new policy forcing them to serve in Iraq effective at end-November.


LINK
Author Message
Tumbleweed

Admin
Admin




Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts



Reputation: 119.9
votes: 4
PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 6:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
I don't blame them. I hope they all revolt against going. I'm sure Rice will get them to come around. After all, she a big power broker with an excellent success rate. Laughing
Author Message
CHUQ

Agitator
Boss




Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts



Reputation: 133
votes: 3
PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 2:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
If they do not go, Bush will just hire a private contractor to handle it, like everything else in his admin.
Author Message
CHUQ

Agitator
Boss




Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts



Reputation: 133
votes: 3
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 4:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
I have mixed emotions about this. On one hand, it could be seen as a protest, yet on the other they are in service to the country. thoughts?


This week's outburst by U.S. Foreign Service officers over the potential for forced deployments to Iraq, to make up for a shortage of volunteers, undoubtedly will be met with disdain from members of the Armed Services and some other civilian agencies of our government. The emotive response from the nation's diplomats, and the military's frustration over feeling very alone in this Long War, are symptoms, not causes, of a much deeper problem.

To recap: At a State Department town hall Wednesday, hundreds of diplomats cried foul over a new policy that could cost them their jobs if they turn down assignments in Baghdad or outlying provinces. "It's one thing if someone believes in what's going on over there and volunteers, but it's another thing to send someone over there on a forced assignment," declared one Foreign Service veteran. "I'm sorry, but basically that's a potential death sentence and you know it. Who will raise our children if we are dead or seriously wounded?"


LINK
Author Message
Tumbleweed

Admin
Admin




Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts



Reputation: 119.9
votes: 4
PostPosted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 5:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Well, I can see why they don't want to go. Diplomat service isn't quite like military service. As for serving our country, that is just a catch phrase. Patriotism only works with ribbons and flag waving. When there are real sacrifices to be made patriots get pretty scarce.
Author Message
CHUQ

Agitator
Boss




Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts



Reputation: 133
votes: 3
PostPosted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 2:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Whiners unite!


Washington bureaucrats are whining to beat the band. They are whining because they may be forced to serve in Baghdad because there is not enough volunteers. I say, F*ck 'em! The troops are sent and they may not want to go, but their country has need for them to do their job. Bureaucrats are no different! They are in service to the country and I understand their concern about dying, but the troops have the same concerns and they serve proudly. Stop being a coward! Do what you are paid to do!


LINK
Author Message
CHUQ

Agitator
Boss




Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts



Reputation: 133
votes: 3
PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
The battle is getting bitter.


WASHINGTON - A bitter dispute over forced assignments to Iraq has erupted inside the State Department with diplomats taking decidedly undiplomatic potshots at one another.

The latest public salvo came Tuesday with a harshly critical post on the department's official blog in which a foreign service officer in Iraq skewered those who spoke out against the prospect of ordered tours of duty at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad and outlying provinces.

The message, titled "A Letter From Iraq to My Overwrought Colleagues," accused opponents of being spoiled elitists whose revolt against so-called "directed assignments" is embarrassing.


LINK
Author Message
Tumbleweed

Admin
Admin




Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts



Reputation: 119.9
votes: 4
PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
I have to wonder how effective these same diplomats can be if they are unhappy with their assignment?
Author Message
CHUQ

Agitator
Boss




Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts



Reputation: 133
votes: 3
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
I am sure that most of the troops are not real thrilled with their assignments and they still do a good job.
Post new topic   Reply to topic    American Politics Forum Index » Middle East Merge topics 


Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours

Display posts from previous:

  

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum
You can password protect topics in this forum

You can topic ban in this forum
You can prevent guests in topics in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum

Remove cookies set by this forum
All content © 2007 AmericanPoliticsForum.com | Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
phpBB SEO | bbantispam.com